অযোধ্যার রামমন্দির নিয়ে মামলায় বাবরী মসজিদের বিরুদ্ধে ও রামমন্দিরের পক্ষে আর্যসমাজ

 


 309. The first defendant is the legal representative of Gopal Singh Visharad (the plaintiff in Suit 1); the second defendant was the plaintiff in Suit 2 (which was subsequently withdrawn); the third defendant is Nirmohi Akhara (the plaintiff in Suit 3); the fourth defendant is the Sunni Central Waqf Board (the plaintiff in Suit 4); the fifth and sixth defendants are Muslim residents of Ayodhya and Faizabad; the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth defendants are the State of Uttar Pradesh and its officers; the eleventh defendant is the President of the All India Hindu Mahasabha; the twelfth and thirteenth defendants represent the All India Arya Samaj and the PJI India Sanatan Dharma Sabha respectively; the fourteenth defendant was Sri Dharam Das, described as the Chela of Baba Abhiram Das, who was allegedly involved in the incident which took place on 22/23 December 1949; defendants fifteen and sixteen are Hindu residents of Ayodhya and Faizabad, defendant seventeen was a resident of District Faizabad (since deleted); defendants eighteen and nineteen are Mahant Ganga Das and Swami Govindacharya Manas Martand.....

 চূড়ান্ত রায়ের কপি থেকে দেওয়া ছবি । পৃষ্ঠা নং ৩৫৭ । 

 

  • নিরাকারবাদী হয়েও রামমন্দিরের মাহাত্ম্য কী আর্যসমাজের কাছে - 


 

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.